.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to arktouros.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="arktouros:1050590"]i had a 93 caddy seville. it was a beautiful car with boatloads of horsepower. it had 120,000 miles when i bought it back in '03 for [b]$1400.[/b] apart from the 32valve engine, the 1997 deville is the same car. GM is notorious for for their cars from the 90's being absolute shit and cadillacs are no exception. you don't see a lot of 90's GMs out there today that are in good shape compared to others. some of the multiple problems i had with the seville - the rear strut systems made a shitload of noise over bumps and were sunken in. you see a lot of older caddys around with the back half of the car hunched down, that's why. the engine cooling system never worked right. i had to replace the water pump and the radiator and it would still overheat. by the time i got rid of it i couldn't drive 5 miles without overheating. this was around 140,000mi. the biggest problem with it - NINE MILES PER GALLON. don't get me wrong, it's a beautiful car when it worked right. but i can even see from this picture that the rear end of the car is sunken down a little bit. i wouldn't buy it and i think it's a ripoff. just sharing my cadillac experience.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.006 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][